Scoping Review: Definition and Elements
A scoping review is a type of knowledge synthesis that uses a systematic approach to identify and synthesize literature on a given topic. Scoping reviews are conducted to map the extent, range, and nature of the literature, as well as to determine possible gaps in the literature on a topic.
Elements of a Scoping Review:
- Research team: including two independent screeners, a tie-breaker, librarian, and statistician
- Broad research question
- Written and registered protocol: OSF
- Inclusion/exclusion criteria
- Comprehensive literature searches of multiple databases: performed by librarian
- Screening and study selection: two independent screeners, conflicts resolved by third reviewer
- Data charting table
- Reporting guidelines: following PRISMA for Scoping Review checklist
- Time: scoping reviews can take 6-12 months to complete
Types of Reviews
There are different types of literature reviews that vary in terms of scope, comprehensiveness, time constraints, and types of studies included.
- Grant, M.J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26, 91–108.
- Higgins JPT, Green S (editors).Box 2.3.b: Timeline for a Cochrane review. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from http://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org. Accessed February 16, 2018.